There is a fascinating parallel between this and @robinhanson's recent Challenge Coins proposal. Both are friendly tests of defense mechanisms for adversarial environments (which pretend to be non-adversarial or well-defended, hence do insufficient testing).https://twitter.com/Meaningness/status/1047507838493499392 …
They don't need to participate, that's the good thing about an adversarial environment. You can choose to be the adversary. Sokoling works by submitting through the regular process, proving that process is flawed.
-
-
I predict that, instead, the establishment will circle the wagons around the journals and prepare to call Sokoling unethical and a tool of their political enemies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Five years ago, I suggested systematically Sokaling all peer-reviewed journals. To “Sokal” is, hereby, to attempt to publish clearly bogus papers to illustrate the brokenness of the academic publication process.