So I wonder: What if instead of thinking blockchain is about money, we view it as a more general realization of the need to shrink attack surfaces in a connected, adversarial world. Bitcoin (patching money to fix the fiat exploit) is just this mindset's first product.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Future products probably won't be about money (the fiat exploit doesn't need 100 different fixes), but will share similar properties: using transparent consensus mechanisms to secure valuable resources that are currently being exploited.
Show this thread -
Many others have enumerated those possibilities, this is just another angle on characterizing them, one that's in some ways maximalist (BTC/PoW=money), in some ways not (many future non-money uses). Inspired by
@NickSzabo4@real_vijay@balajis and especially...Show this thread -
.
@NTmoney for "Cryptoeconomics is the study of economic interaction in adversarial environments" (https://thecontrol.co/cryptoeconomics-101-e5c883e9a8ff …). Perhaps there's even an analogy to public choice theory, which we could think of as "the study of political interaction in adversarial environments."Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I loved that book as a kid. That was when the KGB sufficiently lacked hacking skills and outsourced it all to shady Germans...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stoll spoke at my graduation. His book at the time was "Silicon Snake Oil," which made some howlingly wrong predictions about the future of the Internet. But I do think of that book sometimes when I see the disconnection between humans modern social media has bred.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.