You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Federal-level voting has less than 1 bits/year of bandwidth. (0.5 reps + 0.25 president + 0.166 senators) If voters cannot coordinate a swift overturning of the two parties, they can totally just decide not to do UBI. If voters can coordinate it, repr. democracy is ~ obsolete.
This is the special vs. concentrated interests problem of public choice theory. Those whose entire income depends on a program will devote their entire bit of voting bandwidth to it. Others will devote less, so lose.
Yes, but concentrated-among-millions is still breakfast for Moloch. Even with dedicated UBI-voters and a new UBI party, the Schelling point is Repocrats/Demoblicans. If you want to assist Moloch here, just found multiple uncoordinated UBI parties...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WboggjN_G-4 …
Disagree, it's like currently where Social Security & Medicare recipients will vote out anyone who threatens their benefits, regardless of party. Thus R/Ds can only compete over those policy positions that don't threaten a concentrated interest.
R/D can only *compete* over such positions. I suggest the two parties could *coordinate* over opposing UBI; they are far better suited to this task than voters are to the task of lifting a 3rd party to victory (esp. with ~current tech). And party discipline is already a thing.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
