Question: What are the biggest differences between crypto-native investors (first/primary capital came from crypto) and other types of tech investors (even those now in crypto)? Is this a false dichotomy? Writing about it this week and interesting in other
takes.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @nlw
Crypto-native investors were much more willing to accept poorly structured ICOs: non-staged, no founder lockup, no clear reason for token price to correspond to usage. They suffer from Bitcoin Bias: analyzing new tokens incorrectly by over-generalizing BTC's properties.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
That's an interesting take, given how much of the critique of the tech investor interest in ICOs was "looking for the next Bitcoin" or getting in on the Bitcoin they missed. Certainly think it's valid for many.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nlw
Sure, everyone will tend to analyze a new field based on the first big winner. But those who just got rich from the first big winner & who don't have experience seeing other industies develop, will have that bias the strongest.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo
More subjective - but have you seen any either crypto-native or previous-tech-investors-gone-crypto that you think are embodying the best of both perspectives?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Def the latter. @jmonegro from @usv who founded @placeholdervc. @naval ofc. @a16z got in early and grokked crypto thanks to people like @balajis. It's harder to evaluate crypto-native investors because it's so early; I don't know who will turn out to have been right.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.