You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Question: What are the biggest differences between crypto-native investors (first/primary capital came from crypto) and other types of tech investors (even those now in crypto)? Is this a false dichotomy? Writing about it this week and interesting in other 
takes.
Crypto-native investors were much more willing to accept poorly structured ICOs: non-staged, no founder lockup, no clear reason for token price to correspond to usage. They suffer from Bitcoin Bias: analyzing new tokens incorrectly by over-generalizing BTC's properties.
That's an interesting take, given how much of the critique of the tech investor interest in ICOs was "looking for the next Bitcoin" or getting in on the Bitcoin they missed. Certainly think it's valid for many.
Sure, everyone will tend to analyze a new field based on the first big winner. But those who just got rich from the first big winner & who don't have experience seeing other industies develop, will have that bias the strongest.
More subjective - but have you seen any either crypto-native or previous-tech-investors-gone-crypto that you think are embodying the best of both perspectives?
If you got rich from BTC or ETH, you have a gut instinct that token use drives token price. But for non-SoV, the velocity problem breaks that. Crypto-rich are more willing to trust they will somehow profit from network adoption.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
