There *is* competition in the government business, traditionally it has been called "war". And doing a start-up is easy, provided you can survive the competition...
-
-
-
The barrier to entry is not infinite, but winning a revolution is a pretty damn high moat. So we should not be surprised by the lack of new entrants and extremely slow pace of innovation.
-
I'm a bit worried this is not the right framework to start with. I'm not convinced that government's are in the customer-satisfaction business.
-
They are poorly designed mechanisms, sure. But in a competitive environment (easy entry of new firms, exit of customers), the laws of evolution mean that desirable states will grow population (market share). It's almost tautological.
-
Still, different frameworks. In an environment where most of the competition is via force, brute or not, the evolution means the strong will eat the weak. Outside of capitalism, competition is rarely about best service to customers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also it may take a lot of trials, errors and creative innovations before the customers really figure out what it is they actually want.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.