He's being attacked for glory-hounding + poor-mouthing the successful rescue. His "help" was a virtue-signalling publicity stunt. Contra Ayn Rand, sometimes people hate you because you are a dick, not just b/c "great." Elon Musk is not Howard Roark, FFS.https://twitter.com/patrissimo/status/1017098712768602112 …
-
-
Replying to @DDoSCapitol
Virtue signaling is bad when it replaces actual virtue, and it is good when it demonstrates actual virtue for deserved positive response. The latter is virtue signaling harnessed for social gain (like rich people donating their time to save kids' lives), which is a good thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrissimo @DDoSCapitol
The argument you're not engaging here is that the mini-sub is an example of the former type of virtue signaling rather than the latter. Note the combination of extravagant signalling and no actual benefit provided. There is harm here; Gresham's law applies to virtue signaling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @blahblahblah9tn @DDoSCapitol
Sure, if there was no chance of benefit, then it was a waste. I don't consider that proven, but if you see it that way, I agree it's wasteful virtue signaling. Still, your critique is not the same as many others' critiques, which seem to be envy-based.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrissimo @DDoSCapitol
This is pretty unambiguous, no?https://www.facebook.com/cnninternational/videos/10156536673899641/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's one statement by one person. It may be accurate, it may not. Here's his response:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/10/elon-musk-says-his-mini-submarine-can-be-used-for-other-things.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.