Not having children lowers humanity's lifetime earnings, an outcome known as the "extinction penalty." But no worries, anti-natalism solves itself via brutal negative feedback on its meme-holders & genetic correlates. #PraiseMolochhttps://twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1006997584513306624 …
-
Having 10 children increases humanity earnings but no one does it. Between ( and including) zero and infinity everything is a legiitimate free choice
Of course I don't want to force children on anyone. Just pointing out that humanity's net income for a child is cost (decrease in parents' lifetime earnings) + revenue (everything the child earns). Everything today exists because that net income has averaged positive.
-
-
Aggreed. That´s mathematically correct.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.