Yes, I understand the extreme anti-fiat view. I've heard it from radical goldbugs & Austrians for decades. It's not supported by even mainstream Austrians or fringe-but-reputable economists. Or evidence. It's moral outrage masquerading as empirical claims. https://twitter.com/paul_btc/status/1012769551002619904 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Sure, inflation is a morally questionable hidden tax that distorts the economy. That doesn't make it infinitely bad. Notice the loaded language "out of the charts" (tautologically false, just adjust chart scale), the exaggerated claim that not even one millennial can buy a house.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
This is right-wing virtue signaling, their equivalent of leftist moral outrage. Inflation=bad, so we must only talk about the bad things it does to bad people & good things to good people. To mention limits to it's badness is to defend badness which is heresy.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Sorry "Currency Justice Warriors", but some of us have been sorting through fringe economic theories for 20 years. We don't take right-wing bluster any better than left-wing bluster. We use models and examine facts. We know outrage is the sign of an emotionally-driven position.
3 replies 3 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @patrissimo
All theft helps some people and hurts some people. Just because it is only skimming a little from everyone, and even if it pushes along a sluggish economy, doesn’t give the rulers the right to do it. Also most empirical facts ignore the unseen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I didn't say anyone had the right to do it. Or not. I don't find rights-based discussions to be very productive. Just saying the empirical consequences are neither massive nor simple nor uniformly anti-poor, etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.