We saw this all the time with early XP “transformations”. Sure one team could go 10x faster, but it made no systemic difference, aside from getting that team fired for being troublemakers.
-
-
-
Additionally, the slower teams infect the faster ones with lethargy and apathy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is a big difference between being a troublemaker and a trouble-pointer-outer. To the trouble-pointer-outer. Nobody else cares.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A team moves at the speed of the slowest individual or process, an organization the slowest team, and a company the slowest organization. As a result "How can we move faster?" is always a complex question.
-
Following your logic the answer is segmentation and isolation
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Dealing with other organizations' inefficiency in a more efficient manner than they can is a big competitive advantage for a business though.
-
I guess the difference is that productivity promotes continued market dominance whereas inefficiency does not. (Of course, there might be some other reason for their continued existence in the market despite their inefficiency).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
http://bsdosx.blogspot.com "..rest of the organisation has to evolve around these fixable/preventable failures via...overhead/tax." +intra team
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is kind of the inverse of O-ring theory.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.