One theory about why tech gets regulated is it happens when tech isn't delivering - if we can't fly supersonic, may as well have clean air
-
Show this thread
-
From what I read about the US in the 50s/60s,there was a very positive attitude towards tech, which surprised people after years of conflict
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
It's related to the broader question of why and when we decide to make tech progress a priority. Seems like it's lots of snowball effects.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Some data on how technology is affecting sectors at very different rates https://www.mercatus.org/publication/regulation-and-productivity?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=research&utm_campaign=MercatusTweets&526141033 …pic.twitter.com/WZNAwtIijV
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @asteroid_saku @sknthla
Big question is how they are defining “output”...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrickc
I don't quite believe that productivity mismeasurement is a thing - would like to be convinced otherwise!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asteroid_saku @patrickc1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @asteroid_saku @sknthla
I don't mean mismeasurement in that sense (and, yes, agree that it's hard to see how there's enough missing GDP). I mean the opposite.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
As in, measured GDP growth that's "bad" / indicative of structural problems. E.g. healthcare GDP is growing.
-
-
-
Replying to @asteroid_saku @sknthla
Yeah this is the basic issue with all sectoral growth rate vs regulation analyses I've seen. (And I don't see an easy way to solve it.)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.