Scott Aaronson's (long) "Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity" essay is great. http://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/philos.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @narayanarjun
@narayanarjun So, I found that part a little weak because it still assumes too much. (Independent samples from fixed distribution, for eg.)2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrickc
@narayanarjun I agree with its thrust and I agree that PAC is suggestive. But Bayesian reasoning seems more helpful.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@narayanarjun And I wish 7.2 had been longer... It ended just as it got interesting.
1:19 PM - 2 Aug 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.