@patrickc yeah, tonnes of good stuff there. My favorite is chapter 4, although chapter 7 is great too (but I was never a fan of Hume anyway)
-
-
-
@narayanarjun So, I found that part a little weak because it still assumes too much. (Independent samples from fixed distribution, for eg.) - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
(Though, with a title like that, could it not be?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sknthla Yep; chapters 3 and 5 have a nice discussion of this.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patrickc it fascinates me how the Chinese room argument is taken seriously in some circles. It falls apart on a simple complexity analysis. -
@narayanarjun Yes, I've always found idiotic on a bunch of levels
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@patrickc Long shot but do you keep a list of essays / books you are enjoying / recommending? -
@daniellenewnham No, sorry :(. I keep thinking that I might start, though. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.