@BenedictEvans yes, but not at the expense of our system of government.
-
-
Replying to @rabois
@rabois@BenedictEvans how would that compromise our system of government?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sparkycollier
@sparkycollier@rabois the constitution that said slavery, segregation and interment were OK? Burn it.7 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
@BenedictEvans@sparkycollier go back to the UK if you believe that rubbish3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @rabois
@rabois@sparkycollier which is rubbish - the slavery, segregation or internment? Or the Supreme Court endorsements of them?2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
@BenedictEvans your idea of burning the Constitution. This is the reason you migrated here & why we are the beacon of hope for the World.5 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
@BenedictEvans I am not opposed to amending the Constitution. Just follow the prescribed process for that, not circumnavigate it.3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @rabois
@rabois@BenedictEvans Didn't Jefferson want a regular process for revising? I think they were too tired by end of Convention to formalize.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @patrickc
@patrickc@BenedictEvans Yes, and the Tea Party, ironically re Benedict's tweet, wants to revise the document.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@rabois @BenedictEvans I'd be all for a regular revision mechanism. Originalism always baffled me.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.