@BenedictEvans yes, those "obligations" either violate Constitution or have an explicit Congressional scheme which provides $ for reports.
-
-
@patrickc@BenedictEvans Yes, and the Tea Party, ironically re Benedict's tweet, wants to revise the document. -
@rabois@BenedictEvans I'd be all for a regular revision mechanism. Originalism always baffled me. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@patrickc@rabois@BenedictEvans he thought it should be looked at and revised every ~20 yearsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.