Quadratic voting: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2003531&download=yes …. Trade votes with cost increasing with the square of the number of votes bought.
-
-
Replying to @patrickc
Motivation in paper is gay marriage in CA. Rejecting Prop 8 clearly better for same-sex household couples and other LGBT individuals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrickc
With conservative assumptions around asymmetric value of rejection, vote transfers could have avoided Pareto-inefficient outcome.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Paper contains interesting discussion of QV as the unique rule that is always efficient.
1:36 PM - 3 Jan 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.