Quadratic voting: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2003531&download=yes …. Trade votes with cost increasing with the square of the number of votes bought.
Motivation in paper is gay marriage in CA. Rejecting Prop 8 clearly better for same-sex household couples and other LGBT individuals.
-
-
With conservative assumptions around asymmetric value of rejection, vote transfers could have avoided Pareto-inefficient outcome.
-
Paper contains interesting discussion of QV as the unique rule that is always efficient.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.