http://paulgraham.com/95.html Unless you think the US should have far *fewer* engineers, I can't see how one can oppose doubling their number.
@mcfunley But agreed in the sense that we should presumably optimize for optimal societal outcome rather than what's best for the engineers.
-
-
@mcfunley Abstract of second paper below. Hard to measure, but I don't think the claim is prima facie absurd.pic.twitter.com/2IvmDhMMZV
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
@patrickc right I can get behind a lot of things that might harm me personally, e.g. progressive income tax.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.