This is good for the environment (shorter commutes)
, good for families (affordable homes)
, good for economic mobility (
https://www.nber.org/papers/w24661 ), and good for the country (
https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/chang-tai.hsieh/research/growth.pdf …).
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The man pictured is the developer of the project in question
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Just another reminder, you don't own real estate, you only rent it from the government...
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
Novi razgovor -
-
-
That 18% increase figure cannot be correct. That would indicate there are only 15,000 homes in San Francisco today, a city with a population of 880,000 people. I mean, I know the city is packed, but not 53-people-per-household kind of packed.
-
south sf and sf are two different municipalities.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I won’t hold my breath that this will drive rent/housing costs down...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The bubble will pop by the time they're built and they won't be necessary. Central planning always works out in the end.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Oakland is adding 6800 units to its housing stock this year ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.