Almost by definition, you can’t draw meaningful conclusions about nascent technologies or industries with present-state analyses.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"To answer that question, I used the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s most recent long-term forecasts for the number of new electric vehicles through 2050"


(Here's a sterling example of their work on projected renewable capacity)pic.twitter.com/taHSK0fhLo
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you mildly understand of physics you know intuitively transfering electrons is x1000 easier than hydrocarbons. That's it. There is nothing else to talk about around electric vehicles. The future is always anything that improves aggregate efficiency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also they don't take into account the hidden costs of gasoline cars that are somehow never accounted for. I.e. price it takes to undo pollution caused by them. electric cars however never have the future benefits represented in their current price or how much they will save.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Articles with a question as a headline are generally bad ones.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A barrel of crude oil wrote this article
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Clickbait, innit?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.