Getting my fill of faith in the future: serving today on a mind-bogglingly kind panel, selecting promising scientists for the @SchmidtFellows.
One conclusion: venture capitalists have much to learn from scientists on how to bet on the future.
-
-
And not just what areas to fund but what strategies to employ therein… Do you fund really smart teams and let them run, fun particular approaches, or just focus attention on lowering the cost of doing science and let others do the choosing…
-
Look at you with your legitimate second-order questions :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Same. Would also love to hear proposals to improve the situation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a conversation happening in OSTP as we speak. In my interviews with the Executive, their priorities —quantum, manufacturing, AI, and others - are a reflection of national security and competitiveness. And China. They want maximum R&D output from nat labs, uni, & agencies.
-
And they want private sector to pick up the baton. But the biggest question when tech CEOs get to the White House about what to do? Immigration and short range stuff
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Would love to read a history of this. Who in government decides what areas of science to fund, and why -- the logic, fashion, randomness, and politics of it all.
Calling