Software has an unavoidable tradeoff: More features = less security. If your process for selecting software involves comparing products' feature sets and you don't choose the product with the *smallest* feature set, you're actively selecting for security vulnerabilities.https://twitter.com/Mantia/status/1013559718759956481 …
How about Google and vast surface area of its services? (Not disagreeing with your core point; trying to find other parameters...)
-
-
I'm sure that there are more vulnerabilities *somewhere* in Google than there are in the vast majority of other companies. To the extent that people can use the subset of Google services they want without using other Google services however, this doesn't necessarily matter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.