Two parties to the transaction, one banker from the branch and a second to check data entry, one from HQ and a second to check data entry, one at the receiving bank to ack receipt and a second to check the number matched expectations, one at seller to confirm receipt via phone.
-
-
Show this thread
-
And while that's a characteristic level of overkill because computers are not more likely to flub larger-than-ordinary-but-very-small-relative-to-everything-a-bank-does transaction than they are to flub me buying a sandwich for lunch via a debit card, I appreciate social purpose.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This was actually the case in the US as well when we bought a house. TBH, I would have preferred a fancy suitcase with single purpose screen reporting completion of bank transfer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Funny, we had to go to the bank with the previous owner, queue up the four or five transfers right there and then do a lot of bowing (both sets of agents, lawyer, and judicial scrivener). Possibly because they were trying to squeeze a lot of steps into one to work with my dates.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.