"Politicians don't understand X." / "Regulators don't understand X." This is generally going to round to true for most interesting Xes. (Even the few regulators which spike very deep on domain expertise will by necessity not be at forefront of innovation in the field.)
-
-
Those folks are supported by relatively small staffs, made mostly of smart, ambitious generalists. Those smart, ambitious generalists are mostly in their twenties, and by construction are not heart surgeons themselves, but they have to write the laws that govern heart surgery.
Show this thread -
So what do you do? You hire people who speak the language of politics and speak the language of your domain, and you get them to educate the people who write the laws that the politicians vote on.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The federal government has entire agencies/commissions/other regulatory bodies filled with experts that devote their lives to a specific issue. Surely they’re more objective (viz less biased) than lobbyists and therefore better sources of expertise
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.