“Why is Amazon trying to sell me an X? I just bought an X. Idiots!” People who are compensated strictly based on their ability to predict the future, like poker players and marketers at e-commerce shops, tend to be much better at high school math than Twitter users.
-
-
What's a SWAG for how often a purchase immediately goes wrong? Not right color? Fridge DOA? Shoot I mismeasured my kitchen? Wife just hates it? Call that 2%. If I fix it within a week, then 2% / 7 = 2.9e-3 probability of purchasing a new fridge. That's a 10X relative risk.
Show this thread -
Here's a true statement: People who will in 2018 give birth to a child named Abigail are at least 5X more likely to give birth to a child in 2019 than people chosen at random. "Naming your child Abigail can't make you more likely to get pregnant." Again, failure to do the math.
Show this thread -
(You get a 2X there, for free, from the observation "If you had a child named Abigail this year you are biologically capable of having children; this is not true of no less than half of humanity. Now apply same insight to childbearing age and you're already at 5X+.)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't they know I'm pre-purchase from all the fridge related searches and page views though? Those aren't evenly distributed over my fridge lifecycle.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.