Tarring and feathering technologists who happen to be in the vicinity of e.g. security errors will not successfully achieve resolutions for the process flaws which allowed those errors to happen.
-
-
It all comes down to the cost of the damage, not its preventability. That is why we have insurance companies, government deposit protection and, after all, impunity of intent to commit crime.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But isn’t it interesting how companies push electronic billing as safer than snail mail
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Am ok with tarring and feathering if negligence can be proved.
-
I want a government postmortem of large breaches -- what happened shouldn't be left to come out in discovery in a plaintiff's lawsuit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In contrast to eg pci compliance it seems like there are whole classes of data with no third party on the other side with skin in the game and enough leverage to set security standards.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The instinct to punish individuals for systemic results is pervasive, strong—and mind-bogglingly incorrect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.