I very, very rarely think pro-Bitcoin pieces are well-written or well-reasoned, so I suppose it's extra important to point to them when they are: https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/john-pfeffer/An+Investor%27s+Take+on+Cryptoassets+v6.pdf … I entirely disagree with the investment thesis therein but I learned things reading that.
-
-
"Bitcoin people would never go for that, Patrick. They're too big fans of Satoshi." If you buy the thesis of this paper, holders of Bitcoin will increasingly not be "Bitcoin people", but rather sophisticated investors who don't care about equity allocations to dev teams.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
better than "eventually" – imminent 'Bitcoin United' fork plans this w/ 'inactive addresses', incl Satoshi's: https://www.ub.com/support/whitepaper …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.