Clients buy a variety of things from consultants, and butt-in-seat-time is the least salient of those things. You can increase your rates (or even add line items to an invoice) in compensation with others.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Scheduling predictability: Your “rack rate” (the standard number you quote) is generally for “X amount of time scheduled *after we’ve signed contract* at a mutually convenient time during standard business hours N months out from now.”
Show this thread -
If a client wants you to start tomorrow, that might be something they can buy. Clients can ask a consultant “Be in Germany, tomorrow. You start as soon as you get off the plane.” Nobody does this to employees. It. Is. Not. A. Free. Thing.
Show this thread -
Commitments of availability: some engagements are periodic in nature. A client might want to lock up availability for 9 months from now. If your plan-ahead window is usually 3 months, that also costs money (and/or a retainer, and/or a deposit).
Show this thread -
At a multi-member firm, clients purchase outcomes. If they also get to name their consultants, cool, that’s probably extra. (The firm might choose to distribute some as a bonus. Or might not.)
Show this thread -
The three most important things to getting out of the feast-or-famine cycle are all about recurring revenue. You turn one-off engagements into: a) Repeat work, ideally committed work b) Referrals c) Retainers
Show this thread -
(What’s the difference between repeat work and a retainer? The retainer is paying for the option value of perhaps having work for you. It’s on a use-it-or-lose-it basis and costs a slight discount to scheduling you.)
Show this thread -
The most common thing technologists will sell on a retainer basis is support or maintenance for shipped applications, which is otherwise the client’s responsibility after the acceptance period.
Show this thread -
“What about if there is a bug?” All software has bugs. Everyone buying and selling software knows this. That’s why there are acceptance criteria in your contract which specify who is in charge of bugs at X severity after Y time.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think we call that “contracting” frequently. Feels like it depends heavily on whether one is closer to a consultant or an employee with regards to predictability of re-upping with you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.