A heuristic that I find helpful when looking at fact-intensive debates: if one side is very detail oriented and randomly chosen details are trivially sustained, and the other is an edifice of theory and rhetoric, bet on the details side.
-
Show this thread
-
Not only relevant regarding Bitcoin, but that is where the thought bubbled up today.
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @patio11
care to divulge which bitcoin debate you’re subtweeting? :)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @MattCantor
Whether the exchange which is manifestly engaging in hijinks is in fact engaging in hijinks or not.
7:40 PM - 29 Nov 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.