A heuristic that I find helpful when looking at fact-intensive debates: if one side is very detail oriented and randomly chosen details are trivially sustained, and the other is an edifice of theory and rhetoric, bet on the details side.
-
-
This heuristic isn’t perfect because occasionally folks go to a lot of effort to create alternative worldviews which are detailed like Game of Thrones is detailed, but it’s stood me in good stead most of the time.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
care to divulge which bitcoin debate you’re subtweeting? :)
-
Whether the exchange which is manifestly engaging in hijinks is in fact engaging in hijinks or not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
relevant regarding Bitcoin how?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but!! the crash is actually a correction and a sign that bitcoin is stronger than ever!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haha, I thought this was a Brexit comment from the first tweet!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.