A related and radically more controversial statement: AppAmaGooBookSoft is much better at securing your data than you are, dear reader.
-
-
Show this thread
-
"But what about a nation state threat?" Who do you want the subpoena delivered to, your legal team or Google's legal team? Google's legal team is really good and if you use Gmail they're the ones filing all the motions, not you. You should urgently prefer that state of affairs.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And aren't they more interesting targets for threats for that reason? They're hubs of interesting data. Instead a small company could use its insignificance as protection.
-
Your adversary is less "Someone who cares about you specifically" and more "A for loop designed to deploy ransomware at scale" or "Your own operational errors", neither of which depend on the objective scale of your data.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not having to store customer credit cards in my database is a huge relief.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think that's the full story. Data security is also about process and social engineering. When you blindly store on the cloud, end-users lose their sense of responsibility.
-
I don’t know about your users, but mine have no idea where data is stored - whether it’s in our DC or a cloud service somewhere. For them it’s either on their PC or it’s “elsewhere”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Generally, this statement applies more broadly than most would like to admit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why I find
@Hacker0x01 so exciting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sand many medium sized ones too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.