BTC ETF denied. Great example of benefits of participation in regulatory process: one CS professor cited ~25 times. https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/batsbzx/2017/34-80206.pdf …
-
-
I was mulling sending in one, too, but was a bit busy. (And, ironically, my financial interests would be better off with an ETF. Short to 0)
-
Do you think BTC will fail over the long term? I think the demand for cheap/fast payments will remain, current price feels high tho
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
ha, haven't been on the
@ButtCoin forums in awhile, good to see Stolfi is still around and kickingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@patio11 there's a fair amount of economic pseudo-science in that letter. He also claims without proof Lightning fundamentally can't work.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@patio11 he also overemphasized distinction between legal and illegal usage, which shouldn't matter for the SEC, as evidenced by NYSE:RGR -
.
@patio11 the actual rejection letter from the SEC only considers the low liquidity of Gemini and risk of price manipulation, which is fair. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fun letter; says "proof-of-work is pointless" - "could achieve same service & security on a shared database of 4 companies". Yeah..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.