That fact is "pro-life." It's the desideratum for millions of Americans. That it is common desideratum is a good reason for pluralism.
-
-
Replying to @patio11
Nowhere close — not within the distance between the East and West Coast — of women engineers are anti-choice.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tqbf
I'll stipulate to 10% if you're more comfortable with that number and am explicitly not addressing the actual abortion question.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patio11
I think it’s also unfair to pro-lifers to suggest that they would vote for Donald Trump.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I have plenty of pro-life relatives. My mom is pro-life. She’s not voting for Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tqbf
Stipulate that many people will not have exactly same decisionmaking calculus as this hypothetical, stylized 22 year old.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
We should probably still care, as industry, to not end up either firing her on November 3rd or give her *reasonable fear of same.*
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patio11
It is boggling my mind that you picked a hypothetical WOMAN to experience “reasonable fear” of Trump LOSING.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tqbf
Or pick a black guy. Or a candidate of a non-traditional age or educational background. Or anyone we want in the industry.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patio11
Can you find a demographic underrepresented in the industry that isn’t threatened by Trump? I can’t think of one.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
I could, but for this argument to work, just have to observe "underrepresented" intersect "will vote T" not empty set. (Materially.)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.