I get that for some users it is a price increase, but Github non-enterprise-version has been criminally underpriced for professionals.
-
-
-
"We've got 30 developers! This is going to cost us $270 a month!" If you had a meeting to complain about it THE MEETING WOULD COST MORE.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11 It actually cut our bill in half. $100 down to $48. Was totally happy paying $100. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -
@Shpigford@patio11 That's at the "don't care deeply about rounding errors, do deeply care about devs being on OUR ecosystem" end anyway.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11 Oh look, they made exactly the pricing changes I've been saying they should try since they came out. Think I'll go feel smug now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 Breaks the model of adding customers to organisation to give them repo access. I’ve seen it with pre-release books.
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11@gcouprie Seems fair but their is some edge casepic.twitter.com/kDe3ZYSVdM
-
@BodinSamuel@patio11@gcouprie That specific edge case involves enterprise pricing, which is where you can negotiate ad hoc terms anyway.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.