-
-
Replying to @thegrugq4 replies 19 retweets 38 likes
-
Replying to @dakami2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @patio113 replies 2 retweets 8 likes
-
Replying to @dakami1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @patio111 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @mikebutcher
@mikebutcher Anyone who can sign an arbitrary message created by a 3rd party w/ one of Satoshi's private keys, has his private key.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mikebutcher
@mikebutcher Apparent senders of email are very, very easy to fake. Satoshi has previously signed with PGP keys; re-using one would work.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patio11
@mikebutcher Meaning: signing a new message using a previously used PGP key would be ~100% proof he controls Satoshi's PGP keys.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@mikebutcher I keep using "control of a key" rather than "is Satoshi" because, hypothetically, could be in league, could have hacked, etc.
6:23 AM - 2 May 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.