The channel you enter by is either formally or informally viewed as a quality signal and it is weighted STUPID high.
-
-
The name for "prove you can write a for loop" is FizzBuzz; you can Google it. It (and isomorphic tasks) *actually filter folks out.*
-
@patio11 And given statistical distribution of sub-FizzBuzz devs currently on payroll, being marginally above FizzBuzz grade is worth $$.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11@DarkSoul4242 oh i found one (junior) who couldn't figure out why 3/5 == 0. 5 year and thousands euros spent on formation (Epita)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 in an interview a big name company asked me to implement fizz-buzz but were disappointed that I didn’t use objects…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 for loops are the tool of the procedural imperialist scumThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 This is one of the best tweetstorms I have read in a long time. Please convert this into a blog post.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 He's obviously a functional programmer :) You should write about some absurd real stories you've seen on thisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 Don't let asking about for loops stop you from asking about, say, leadership. Unless for loops are most important thing they'll do.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 Such people exist, once recommended to hire someone like that, not sure how got fooled, but no programming test administered.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.