An angel investor who owns 1% of a company and an employee who is offered 1% of the company are not not not in materially similar positions.
-
-
This was an actual thing with Twitter pre-IPO: early employees couldn't afford tax bill if they left and exercised options, had to wait yrs.
-
A biggie: stock deals are complicated. Angels get competent legal advice. Everyone expects this. An employee who lawyers up is distrusted!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.