After N weeks of React I don't know if I'd reach for it for most of e.g. the standard Rails app but if you've got any dynamism at all YES.
-
-
@patio11 Why not just use server side javascript responses with Rails for basic dynamic updates?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 It's wonderful to watch a JS grumpypants finally get it (even as an Angular dev myself)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 I prefer Ractive.js, has much more sensible templates. :-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 If you like Rails, you would like Ember. Ember is to React what Rails is to Sinatra. A more opinionated, curated stack.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 React as a separate app talking to a Rails API or using something like react-rails?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 I agree, but switching between erb and jsx is such a painful workflow esp as a 1-man teamThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.