After N weeks of React I don't know if I'd reach for it for most of e.g. the standard Rails app but if you've got any dynamism at all YES.
-
-
The genius of Rails: programmer complexity is O(N) on app features. Dynamic UI in JS & callbacks is O(N^2). React O(N); worse constant.
-
@patio11 Why not just use server side javascript responses with Rails for basic dynamic updates?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11 (And I consider apps ranging from Basecamp to Github to Shopify to be documents with sprinkles for their majority cases). -
New conversation -
-
-
@patio11 I've moved to packing a nodejs backend (for server-side React) plus Rails (or whatever) for APIs. Much more manageable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 Hogs and wash. All depends on the dynamicism you seek. Making a full SPA like that? Sure. Document with sprinkles? No.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@patio11 imo the frontend discussion has been answered by react. next up: adapted tooling on serverside (railslike api frameworks for node?)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.