$50 is a much better minimum buy-in for most B2B services than $20 is. You'll make a lot more money, sure, but you'll enjoy the reduced support headaches and vastly lower churn even more.https://twitter.com/_rchase_/status/1261098904856207360 …
-
-
(Note that it takes a while for this sort of thing to catch up because, as a savvy SaaS entrepreneur, you're not raising the price for existing users but rather raising it on new cohorts.)
Show this thread -
This also tends to improve the product over time, too, since all of your inbox is from customers who understand that your product is worth $50+ a month, can trivially budget that for their business, and have the kinds of sophistication-increasing feedback you'd expect.
Show this thread -
So you're pulled in the direction of "Can you integrate this with [ERP commonly deployed in your space]?" or "I'm an enterprise, can I get this with better auditing tools for 10X as much money?" and not "Ugh this is so complicated; can you make it more like Facebook please."
Show this thread -
Complexity isn't a mark of good software but a lot of good B2B software is complex, principally because you're generally helping professionals work and the work professionals do is intrinsically complex. There are better and worse ways to expose/manage that complexity.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't underestimate the value to you of a competitor getting the pathological accounts. They will cause company wide dysfunction that drives more of the sane customers to you...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.