This is a very counterintuitive way of looking at the world. Speaking generally rather than specifically: one generally wants a budget for fraud (or similar negative things) and to spend that budget prudently, not drive to zero. Socially non-desirable to say in as many words.https://twitter.com/ByrneHobart/status/1260264924967768064 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @patio11
I'm may be misunderstanding ,but I want to summarize what you are saying : too strict enforcement of negative externalities leads to more drawbacks due to the cost of enforcement vs. the amount of fraud prevented.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Jamesthesnake @patio11
I suspect perhaps it’s more than just that? If your filters are so tight that you can demonstrate no frauds/negatives, you have in any practical environment improperly excluded non-fraud/positive opportunity?
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
Replying to @mdhardeman @Jamesthesnake
That is a very, very real factor.
11:11 AM - 12 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.