Rates exert gravity. If you charge more, you’ll spend your time talking to more sophisticated clients, working in better businesses, specializing in projects close to the money. These are compounding advantages. If you charge less, similar dynamics apply.
-
-
(“But don’t you need to pay your dues to skill up prior to doing something more ambitious?” I think one of the core realizations one should take from Silicon Valley is that at least some people “paying dues” have an alternative trajectory which learns 100X as much per year.)
Show this thread -
(The people you are paying dues to are not necessarily incentivized to tell you of the existence of of faster paths, and this is not always because they’re malicious. They’re probably as enmeshed in the system that produced them as you are.)
Show this thread -
And this is why I love the Internet, because it can be both a vector for discovery of better opportunities, a repository of the skills one needs to successfully execute on them, and ample existence proofs (and synthetic pants kicking) that it is possible to be more ambitious.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are you implying instead of going small SaaS solo founder the typical SV founder path *may* have resulted in more faster learning (mo

or not) -
I think there are some ways for those distributions to overlap, but in the interest of rigor: do I feel I would have learned more over 5 years doing YC than running the companies I actually ran the first two times? Yes. Unambiguously yes. Do I regret meeting my wife? Nope!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.