@patio11 I recently saw your article https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ … (via https://twitter.com/leakissner/status/1066761697254289408?s=21 …) and am really curious: what name have you seen that violated assumption 11 (is representable in Unicode)?
-
-
Ah, I see - so characters that ought to have been in Unicode but were omitted due to oversight or just not there yet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
