Pro-tip: literally no one should have their only email address be one tied to their employment, even if it is at a company you own. Your desire to remember conversations and access retirement accounts will outlive your association with most institutions.https://twitter.com/devonzuegel/status/1058217280289427456 …
-
-
There’s tension in centralizing all the eggs in one basket! It’s not obvious that “Give all the data to Google and have them drop $10 billion on securing it” is the right equilibrium, but concrete alternatives have fairly major downsides on the security front.
-
Yes there is tension in securing all eggs in one basket. No one is proposing that. I'd love to see an *optional* system akin to our analog identity systems. Digital IDs issued by the state gov you live in. Expire every 3-5. Keys stored in offline vault. Legal ownership of data.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
John Podesta begs to differ, as does the registered base of the Democratic party. It's not Gmail that's weak, in other words, it's people. Your protip is advice for *people.* I'm arguing that identity systems should have the force of law behind them.
-
You mean we should pass a law that says it’s illegal to hack an email account or impersonate someone to their bank/etc? Already exists; how’s it working out.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.