I have one question here: is the junior partner a cofounder who is irreplaceable for this enterprise? Then you should split it evenly; thirds if X is 3. 8 years from now in success case you’ll be known ONLY for current adventure, and the supermajority of value created is future.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Separately from questions of fairness, perceptions of fairness also matter. You do not want, 18 months from now when going through a periodic tough time, for one founder to constantly feel like their efforts are “worth less” and wonder if they should just push reset button.
Show this thread -
“What if they’re not critical to the enterprise?” In most cases I will disagree with this, but I can imagine circumstances where e.g. they get a market salary from day one sourced out of revenue from an existing business or savings or money raised on a handshake previously.
Show this thread -
In one of those circumstances, you might have a “generous for an early employee” grant, but you have to be really, really clear between the N of you about the cofounder/employee distinction because people are going to ask and it really matters in some social situations.
Show this thread -
I am not thrilled about this, but in consensus SFBA culture, there is a pretty titanic gulf between last co-founder and first employee regarding questions like “Should an investor or prospective investor ever desire to talk to you 1:1?”
Show this thread -
(There is also a gap on that particular question of “CEO vs. any other cofounder” but if an investor talks to co-founding CTO w/o telling CEO that is cool but if they talk to employee CTO they *have transgressed.*)
Show this thread -
A thing about generous employee grants: professional money had definite views regarding the total employee allocation (options pool) and overspending on employee #1 will often result in them advocating for revisiting that decision later.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Your initial cut on founder irreplaceability is good. If you are self funding, then a very relevant metric is "how much salary does each person expect in the first year" and/or how much capital is being contributed to start? If OPM, different dynamic.
-
One should deal with different capital contributions with IOUs not with equity. Supermajority of contribution is brainsweat and time; the $30k or $300k is meaningless after the company has material revenue and should just get paid out out of it or professional money.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If your team was to offer consulting services, at what rate would you bill each team member's time to fairly compensate them and profit the company? Convert dollars to shares of an equity pool.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.