(Assuming arguendo that Tether is not a straight up fraud and that its balance sheet is USD equivalents. I have maybe 60% confidence that both of those are true.)
-
Show this thread
-
Anyhow, what the community under appreciates at the moment is that illiquidity is not the only consequence of losing a banking relationship. Banks do talk to each other (quite a bit) and it is difficult to keep billions of dollars under the radar indefinitely.
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likesShow this thread -
Eventually, a bank or, more likely, a regulator is going to say “Actually this doesn’t look like a legit deposit that we’re uncomfortable with supporting due to AML/regulatory reasons. It looks an awful lot like proceeds of crime intermingled with grey money.”
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
And the terrifying outcome, from the cryptocurrency economy perspective, is the regulator doing what the USFH did with respect to Mutum Sigillum (Mt Gox’s US front): “OK, we’re going to give you two choices.”
1 reply 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Door #1: Prove that it’s legal money. This should be trivial for you because KYC is the law and your compliance should be automatic. So have your lawyer suit up. BTW we expect this to take 3+ years. Door #2: We propose a 50% haircut.
2 replies 3 retweets 33 likesShow this thread -
Gox’s bankruptcy administrator took the haircut. That was an eminently sensible call. I think there is a material risk that Tether absorbs a billion dollar hair cut.
2 replies 5 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
A historical precedent for this is the Reserve Fund meltdown in 2008. The Reserve Fund was a money market fund; those are not fully reserved but are expected to invariably be a) liquid as cash and b) maintain $1 par value. If it had a token and didn’t pay interest, that’s Tether
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
The Reserve Fund “broke the buck” due to the poor decision to have several percentage points of their assets in commercial paper of an American financial institution with zero counterparts risk, Lehman Brothers.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
This caused such a large loss of confidence in money market funds as a class that the immediate capital outflow threatened to destabilize the global financial system.
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
The cryptocurrency economy relies on Tether, specifically, far more than the global financial system relies on money market funds. It has convinced itself that they’re equivalent. That is wrong. It has always been wrong. It may soon be experimentally disproven catastrophically.
1 reply 10 retweets 34 likesShow this thread
Tether doesn’t have single digit percentage point exposure to a US financial institution who couldn’t pay them 100% and wouldn’t be able to settle for months. They probably have close to total exposure to a financial institution which will be offering much worse.
-
-
(If you believe I am wrong you can call up your OTC desk of choice and offer to buy N million dollars of tether at a 3% discount to par. Hoover up that free money.)
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
(You know why you can’t call up an OTC desk and offer to buy a deposit held in a US bank for a 3% discount to par, at a trade size of millions? And indeed financial professionals would laugh you out of the room for suggesting it? Yeah.)
2 replies 2 retweets 28 likesShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.