You have some extremely finite number of days prior to retirement, and every day that passes is one that you don't get back. (True of life generally.) Because of the magic of compound interest, those first days are the most expensive ones in this calculus.
-
Show this thread
-
If you wake up 10~15 years into your career without yet having had a very successful outcome, the combination of major life events driving up your personal expenses plus the inexorable retirement math means you might have to take "a real job" to get back on track.
1 reply 3 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Warren Buffet has said you basically get 10 shots at a big investment in your life. A similar logic applies to founding companies: you *probably* have career bandwidth for between 5 to 10. You can sacrifice ~3 of them by neglecting retirement planning at the start of your career.
1 reply 10 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
So what do you do? Simple: take advantage of tax-advantaged retirement plans to sock away a not-terribly-onerous amount of money every month. You and your business won't notice it's gone; you will very likely notice it 15 years from now.
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
"What should I invest in for retirement?" Low-cost index funds. This could be the best studied result known to science. (I mean that entirely literally. Most papers don't carry a multi-billion dollar bounty available to anyone who demonstrates they don't replicate.)
1 reply 5 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
Guess what isn't an option in many people's retirement accounts due to principal/agent problems? Low-cost index funds.
2 replies 4 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Here's what happens: 1) Employers are insufficiently attentive to contents of plans 2) Retirement account providers can get kickbacks from mutual funds for steering assets 3) The most expensive funds can afford the largest kickbacks 4) Not "Employee has best possible outcome"
2 replies 5 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Startup founders are in a much better position than most employers on this score, because they tend to be relatively numerate and because they don't have the principal/agent problem early in the life of the company. It is easy to keep doing the right thing; much harder to start.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likesShow this thread -
Anyhow: the technology of money is endlessly fascinating. If there are particular business-adjacent parts which seem mysterious to you, drop us a line; we love ideas for new things to write about.
4 replies 1 retweet 18 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @patio11
I’m genuinely curious what the pro move is if you expect to change countries every few years. There appears to be no even vaguely rational move.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I feel your pain on that one; even with [1,2) contemplated moves in a lifetime things get far, far more complicated.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.