been realizing lately that business and exec teams missed the memo on blameless post mortems. there's a difference between accountability for results and not hanging people out to dry over individual happenstances that are never fully under any one person's control.
-
-
”fifty percent goals. If you hit all of them, you weren’t aiming high enough.” This was a huge shift for me, because I like to hit ALL of my goals (and feel like a failure if I don’t). It’s been good spiritual practice for me to aim higher and be less attached to outcomes.
-
I love this, and that's why I hate so-called objective based performance review. I'm looking at how you work, not on what. Anyway, the what should be decided by the stakeholders, that's what you're paid for. So why to evaluate someone on something they have no control?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That works for initiatives/projects that aren’t fruitful. What about disasters? Outage, security breach, or other such failure.
-
One mistake shouldn’t lead to catastrophic failure - org should have defence in depth . Post-mortem should be an opportunity to improve protective tools / systems
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.