Conversation

The decision to speak out publicly about the controversy at the Miller Center — a place I have cherished for more than a decade — has been a difficult one. But as this has grown into a national story, I wanted to make my views clear. /1
4
275
The Miller Center has long been a place of thriving bipartisan partnerships and rigorous scholarship. My colleagues and I relish working across partisan and ideological lines. As a scholar of conservatism, I particularly value it. /3
1
75
It should, then, be a worrisome sign to those who would dismiss this controversy as a matter of mere partisanship that so many people who thrive in such an environment see Short's hiring as a genuine institutional and moral crisis. /4
1
91
It should clarify that this is not a rejection of bipartisanship, but rather a response to a violation of the norms of both the MC and UVA, both of which are dedicated to defending and promoting an open society. /5
1
99
As political historians and presidential scholars, we at the Miller Center are well placed to observe that the Trump administration represents a significant rupture in American politics, a rejection of modern liberal democracy. /6
6
179
The Trump administration is a powerfully illiberal force in the United States today. That is not a partisan judgment. It is an understanding of the administration shared across party and ideological lines. /7
3
171
People who still view this primarily as a left-right or Republican-Democrat issue have not caught up to the true crisis of our day: The sides are no longer liberalism versus conservatism, but liberalism versus illiberalism. /8
1
319
Hiring a high-level administration official fresh from the White House does far more to validate and normalize that illiberalism than it does to help us understand it. /9
2
173
On those grounds, I oppose the appointment of someone who has, up until today, been a dedicated defender of the Trump administration and its values. /10
2
149