Great question. I was beginning to agree with the central point of that tweet. I believe u r interested in truth, but, once your mind is made up, a conversation with u is somewhat futile, if the goal is common ground or exchanging viewpoints that could lead to unity. Unless one..https://twitter.com/DrOakley1689/status/1056366730518220800 …
...accepts ur premise, that this text is not addressing ethnic hypocrisy, and circumcision trumps Jewish identity in determining an accurate understanding of the text...then it is a waste of time to further dialogue, although, again, I sincerely believe u r interested in truth.
-
-
Tell me—do you think you have provided any sound exegetical support of your assertion, or sound exegetical refutation of what I presented on my program? If not, which of us should move our position? Or is it always a matter of compromise? Can compromise be sinful?
-
Not asking u to move ur position. I might write a post on my position on this text at a later time. For tonight, in the spirit of unity and striving for common ground over battle ground, I’m not going to further address this subject tonight. If and when I address this,I’ll notify
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.